Skip to main content
Sandy City, UT Logo
File #: BOA12122025-007094    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Planning Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 1/15/2026 In control: Board of Adjustment
On agenda: 2/12/2026 Final action:
Title: Falls Creek Estates Subdivision (Alleged Error Appeal 2873 and 2851 E. Wasatch Blvd. [Community #28, Pepper Dell]
Attachments: 1. Staff Report, 2. Exhibit A - Appeal Application, 3. Exhibit B - Ivory Homes Response, 4. Exhibit C - PC Presentation 11.20.2025, 5. Exhibit D - PC Minutes 11-20-2025
Related files: SPX11112025-007076, SUB09152025-007042
Agenda Item Title:

Title

Falls Creek Estates Subdivision (Alleged Error Appeal

2873 and 2851 E. Wasatch Blvd.

[Community #28, Pepper Dell]

Body

Presenter:

Melissa Anderson, Zoning Administrator

Body

Description/Background:

The appellants, Garrett and Samantha Lisi (represented by the law firm Clyde, Snow & Sessions), have requested the Board of Adjustment review an alleged error by the Planning Commission in their decision to determine preliminary submission review was complete on the Falls Creek Estates Subdivision located at 2873 and 2851 E Wasatch Blvd. The Lisi’s own the neighboring property at 2859 E. Wasatch Blvd. and have claimed that they were adversely impacted by the decision.

On November 20, 2025, the Planning Commission held a public meeting for preliminary subdivision review of the Falls Creek Estates Subdivision, which proposed to adjust property lines between a lot and an abutting remnant parcel to create one additional lot. The Planning Commission determined that the preliminary subdivision review for the Falls Creek Estates Subdivision was substantially complete with conditions. The appellant asserts that the Planning Commission erred in their decision because they believe the decision was illegal, as well as arbitrary and capricious (see Exhibit "A"). In response to this appeal, the owner and applicant of the Falls Creek Estates Subdivision, Ivory Development, LLC, submitted a brief to address the arguments of the appeal (see Exhibit "B").

Please refer to the staff report and all exhibits for full details on this case.

Recommended Action and/or Suggested Motion:

Recommendation

The applicant has not met their burden of proving that the Planning Commission decision was illegal or so unreasonable as to be arbitrary and capricious. The appellant bears the burden of proving that the land use authority erred. It is not enough to show that one could reasonably reach a different conclusion on the facts if there is a r...

Click here for full text