Sandy City, UT Logo
File #: CUP12282021-006239 (WS)    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Planning Item Status: Held
File created: 9/21/2023 In control: Planning Commission
On agenda: 10/5/2023 Final action: 10/5/2023
Title: Sego Lily and 1300 East Mixed Use Development (Conditional Use Permit) 10165 S. 1300 E. (Community #17, Willow Canyon)
Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map, 2. Neighborhood Meeting Minutes, 3. Neighborhood Meeting Public Comments as of 9-28-23, 4. Staff Report on Interpretation Question, 5. CUP Application Materials, 6. Minutes From 8/3/23 PC Mtg
Related files: MSC03202023-006505, MSC03202023-006505_2nd, MSC03202023-006505_3rd
Agenda Item Title:
Title
Sego Lily and 1300 East Mixed Use Development (Conditional Use Permit)
10165 S. 1300 E.
(Community #17, Willow Canyon)

Body
Presenter:
Mike Wilcox

Body
Description/Background:
Staff received a land use application on December 28, 2021, for a conditional use permit to allow for a “Mixed Use Development” in the Neighborhood Commercial (CN) Zone. The application indicates that they intend to build 196 residential units, 14,309 sq ft of retail/office space, and 11,523 sq ft of amenity areas. You can view the attached application materials for the conditional use permit.

Upon initial review of the request, city staff felt this fell short of meeting the standards in the code. Staff has been working with the applicant to improve their application. While the applicant has made a few changes since their initial submittal, staff concluded that their application failed to meet the code criteria for a mixed use development. Staff requested that the Planning Commission make the formal determination that their application (as it exists currently) did not constitute a mixed use development as defined in Sandy City Code. That interpretation request (see file MSC03202023-006505) was originally scheduled to go before the Planning Commission on April 20, 2023. After receiving our report and recommendation, the applicant asked for the item to be tabled. The applicant then pursued an opinion from the State Ombudsman’s Office. That review is still pending, and have not yet offered an opinion on the matter. The applicant requested for this interpretation question to be placed on the Planning Commission agenda. That meeting was held with the Planning Commission on August 3, 2023 (see the attached minutes). The Planning Commission did not come to a conclusive decision on the question, but did table the item. In the motion to table, it included direction to the applicant to go back and work with the surrounding land owners and GSBS to consult with them on...

Click here for full text