Sandy City, UT Logo
File #: SUB05102021-006046    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Planning Item Status: Passed
File created: 7/7/2021 In control: Planning Commission
On agenda: 7/15/2021 Final action: 7/15/2021
Title: Mt. Jordan Meadows No. 4 Subdivision (Preliminary Review) Approx. 9270 S. and Benson Way [Community #4 - Historic Sandy]
Attachments: 1. Staff report.pdf, 2. Maps and materials.pdf
Related files: SPX07072021-006098
Agenda Item Title:

Title

Mt. Jordan Meadows No. 4 Subdivision (Preliminary Review)

Approx. 9270 S. and Benson Way

[Community #4 - Historic Sandy]

Body

Presenter:

Craig P. Evans

Body

Description/Background:

The applicant, the Sandy City Public Works Department, is requesting preliminary review for a four-lot subdivision. The applicant is requesting the application of the Residential Conservation Overlay (RCO) Zone and is also requesting a special exception to allow non-buildable parcels to be created because they are a necessary byproduct of the eminent domain process that has been implemented in the 9270 S. realignment project.

The subject property is approximately 2.95 acres in size and currently contains an existing home on lot 401, which will remain. The property is zoned mostly R-1-8, with a portion of the subdivision (Lot 404, the large triangular parcel mistakenly labeled Lot 403 on the preliminary plat) zoned as PO (Professional Office). The property is bordered by single-family homes in the R-1-8 zone to the east and north, the RC (Regional Commercial) zone to the west, and the SD (JHS) (Miller) zone to the south, which is comprised of the Jordan Commons Complex.

Recommended Action and/or Suggested Motion:

Recommendation

Staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine that preliminary review is complete and that the special exception request for non-buildable parcel creation be approved for the Mt. Jordan Meadows No. 4 Subdivision, located at approximately 9270 S. and Benson Way, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:

Findings:

1.                     That the proposed subdivision is an infill development.

2.                     That the proposed lot configuration is an efficient use of the land.

3.                     That remnant parcels are unavoidable in this circumstance.

4.                     That the various City Departments and Divisions have preliminarily approved t...

Click here for full text