Agenda Item Title:
Title
Indigo Subdivision (Preliminary Subdivision Review)
348 E. 8000 S.
Community #3, Sandy Woods
Body
Presenter:
Cache Hancey, Senior Planner
Body
Description/Background:
The applicant, Damian Mora, is requesting a preliminary subdivision and special exception review for a property located at 348 E. 8000 S. The proposal consists of assembling two (2) existing properties and then subdividing them into twenty residential single-family lots. Additionally, he is seeking special exception approval to only require a single point of ingress and egress onto 8000 S, a private road to access the proposed lots, lots not fronting a public street, and a reduced right of way width and private street improvements.
Please see the attached staff report and attachments for full details of the request.
Recommended Action and/or Suggested Motion:
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine that preliminary subdivision review is substantially complete for the Indigo Subdivision at 348 E. 8000 S. based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findings:
1. That the proposed lot configuration is an efficient use of the land.
2. The proposed configuration equitably balances the needs of the public.
3. That the proposed unit count conforms to the requirements of the RM(12) zone
.
4. That the various City Departments and Divisions have preliminarily approved the proposed subdivision plat.
5. That the associated Special Exception are congruent with the proposed subdivision.
Conditions:
1. That all necessary road dedications of 8000 South be carried out through the plat.
2. That a Homeowners Association for the subdivision be established. A set of CC&R’s be recorded with the plat to regulate and ensure maintenance of all common areas. Said documents shall include language that requires use of garages be such that they be used to park vehicles at all times and that garages will not be used for any long-term storage.
3. No on-street parking is permitted within the private road hammerhead terminus and signs restricting on-street parking must be erected along this private street as determined by the City Engineer.
4. That the applicant complies with each department’s comments and redlines throughout the final review process and that all issues be resolved before the subdivision can be recorded.
5. That all City provisions, codes, and ordinances are adhered to during the review, construction, and operations process of this project.
6. That a reciprocal extensible private cross access easement be provided to the surrounding properties to the west to allow for future pedestrian and vehicular access when/if they redevelop further to enable the future connectivity and secondary points of access in the future as shown in the Master Plan Road Exhibit.
7. That the setbacks for the subdivision be determined by the Planning Commission and that these setbacks be recorded as a note on the plat.