Agenda Item Title:
Title
1300 E. Mixed Use Development - Preliminary Site Plan
10165 S. 1300 E.
[Community #17, Willow Canyon]
Body
Presenter:
Clinton Spencer, Development Services Manager
Body
Description/Background:
The applicant, Wade Budge of Snell & Wilmer, LLP (representing the property owner Magna Investment & Development) is requesting preliminary site plan and conditional use review of a mixed use development for the property at 10165 S. 1300 E. Mixed use development is a conditional use in the CN zone. The proposal is to construct a mixed use development with 191 residential units, and approximately 16,090 square feet of retail space. (see Exhibit “A” for application materials). Please see the vicinity map for site location orientation.
Please see the attached staff report and exhibits for full details of the request.
Recommended Action and/or Suggested Motion:
Recommendation
MOTION #2 Site Plan Review
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine that the Preliminary Site Plan Review with the required conditions is complete for the 1300 E. Mixed Use Development project, located at 10165 S. 1300 E., based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findings:
1. That street improvements be carried out according to Plan and Profiles approved by the Sandy City Engineer and specifically:
a. That 1300 East Street be further improved and dedicated to include the required 53’ half-width street as determined by the City Engineer, and to include a 13-foot-wide streetscape behind the curb and gutter (8’ parkstrip and 5’ sidewalk).
b. That Sego Lily be further improved and dedicated to include the required 46’ half-width street as determined by the City Engineer, and to include a 13-foot-wide streetscape behind the curb and gutter (8’ parkstrip and 5’ sidewalk).
2. That the development will comply with all Building & Safety, Fire and Life Safety Codes applicable to this use.
3. The applicant provide assurances as to how the retail and live/work areas will be maintained and limited to commercial activities where designated on the floor plans to prevent encroachment of residential occupancy within those areas.
4. That the developer proceeds through the final site plan review process with staff. The Final Site Plan shall be in compliance with ALL Development Code requirements, outstanding staff redlines, items of planning staff concerns included in this report, and those modifications as required by the Planning Commission.
5. The Planning Commission approve the maximum ten (10) percent parking reduction of forty-four stalls from 438 to 394 minimum and allow the applicant the options to modify their site plan to accommodate the required parking and landscaping in those parking areas, and/or provide final agreements for offsite parking before the final site plan is approved. The developer/owner shall provide a minimum of one stall for each residential unit included in the base lease price of the unit.
6. The height of Building H will need to be corrected to comply with the allowed maximum height of forty (40) feet.
7. All rooftop mechanical equipment, AND other utilities be screened as required by City ordinance, and Architectural Design Standards (ADS).
8. The applicant update ALL elevations with the correct percentages of materials, AND that no more than twenty (20) percent of each elevation be stucco, and comply with the ADS.
9. Add architectural details to sides of the building as identified by staff that currently lack the required detail as set forth in the ADS (IV.A.5).
10. ANY substantial changes to the site plan (as applicable under 21-32-3(a-g) of the City ordinance and also including drive aisle location, retaining wall location, building orientation/configuration, or use) will need to be reconsidered by the Planning Commission at final site plan review prior to obtaining final site plan approval.
11. In regard to the design of the northern retaining wall adjacent to the City skybridge and County Library property the following is required:
a. Provide a full structural analysis of the effects that system would have on our existing pedestrian bridge, particularly the drilled shafts and any changes in lateral earth pressures that could cause settling or deformation, both during construction and into perpetuity.
b. Propose mitigations for all permanent negative impacts on the bridge. The allowable impacts and the proposed mitigations will be subject to approval by the City Engineer.
c. Pay for us to have their structural analysis evaluated and validated by an independent engineering firm of our choosing.
d. They will be required to protect the bridge from all negative impacts during construction and restore or replace as acceptable to the city engineer.
12. The applicant provide staff with evidence that have written approval from all affected property owners of all off-site improvements before final site plan approval including but not limited to pedestrian access, grading, landscaping, etc.